Henri sued Curto, alleging that their sexual encounter was non-consensual.  Curto counterclaimed for tortious interference with his academic contract, alleging that his suspension from Butler University resulted from Henri’s statements to Butler.  Following a jury trial, a verdict was rendered in favor of Curto on both Henri’s complaint and Curto’s counterclaim.  The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, holding that certain irregularities during jury deliberations warranted a new trial.  Henri v. Curto, 891 N.E.2d 135 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008), vacated.  The Supreme Court has granted a petition to transfer the case and has assumed jurisdiction over the appeal.